The STUC

  • The STUC
  • STUC Conference dates
  • STUC Vacancies
  • Affiliate and project vacancies
  • MayDay 2012
  • International Workers Memorial Day
  • Women
  • Unions Into Schools
  • Your rights at work
  • STUC Union Rep Awards
  • Congress 2012 - Inverness
  • Policy
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact The STUC
  • Archive
  • Palestine
  • News
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • March 2002
  • February 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
There is a Better Way Blog

Pensions Justice campaign

%2Ffiles%2Fshot1.2.gif
STUC Twitter
Close the Gap logo
Visit the Scottish Union Learning website
Thompsons - Scotland
You are here >
  • Home
  • News
  • STUC call for Independent Referendum Commission

STUC call for Independent Referendum Commission

January 12th 2012

Grahame Smith, General Secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) has today (Thursday 12th January) written to the First Minister of Scotland, The Secretary of State For Scotland and the Leader of the Scottish Labour Party calling for the establishment of an independent Referendum Commission as follows:-

“The forthcoming Referendum on Scotland’s Constitutional future will be unquestionably the most important political event in Scotland for 300 years.

It is essential that the result of the Referendum, whenever it takes place, should be decisive. If this is to be achieved, the Referendum must have a legal basis that can resist challenge. As important, the process under which the Referendum takes place must generally be accepted as being fair and reasonable. It serves no one’s interest, whether in favour of Scotland remaining part of the UK either under the current devolution settlement or under a different arrangement, or becoming Independent, that the matter is not resolved by the Referendum either because its legality is questionable or because of a deeply held belief that the process was unfair and constructed simply to achieve a pre-determined outcome.

The acrimonious debate in recent days between the Governments of Scotland and the UK, and amongst the political parties, over the process for determining the arrangements for the Referendum has, unfortunately, raised serious doubts about the possibility of agreement being reached on fundamental matters such as the date of the Referendum, under whose auspices it should be run, who should be entitled to vote and what question or questions should appear on the ballot paper.

These, and other matters, require to be resolved with some urgency in order that the people of Scotland can engage fully in the debate on Scotland’s future in an environment free of such political wrangling.

To this end, and to ensure that the Referendum process is generally perceived to be fair and not biased in favour of a pre-determined outcome, the STUC believes that an independent Referendum Commission should be established immediately in Scotland, charged with the responsibility of making recommendations on the conduct of the Referendum, including those issues mentioned above.

While respecting the Scottish Government’s view on the legality of the Scottish Parliament holding a Referendum, the STUC believes that the UK Government’s willingness to devolve the power to hold a legally binding Referendum to the Scottish Parliament has the potential to resolve the issue of legal competence, if a mechanism can be found to reach agreement on the process. I believe an independent Referendum Commission offers such a mechanism.

It seems clear that an issue of particular contention is whether the Referendum should contain the scope for the people of Scotland to consider the option of further devolution of power to the Scottish Parliament short of Independence. It also seems clear that there is an appetite amongst some for a “third option” and for a two question Referendum. However, it is equally apparent that, while there is a range of possible devolution settlements different from the current position, apart from the proposals in the current Scotland Bill (the future of which will be determined prior to the Referendum), there is at present no defined scheme, established from a credible source, that would justify consideration in the Referendum.

If an independent Commission was established, should such a scheme emerge, the Commission could recommend whether and how it be considered in the Referendum.

For the reasons I have set out above, the STUC strongly believes that an independent Referendum Commission should be established and I would urge your support for this proposal.

We are due to meet within the next few weeks. However, should you wish to discuss this proposal or any other matters relating to the Referendum please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best wishes.

Yours sincerely

Grahame Smith General Secretary”

ENDS

• Copies of the letters are attached for your information

• For further information contact Kevin Buchanan 0141 337 8100

©The STUC

Site by CENTRAL