The STUC

  • The STUC
  • STUC Conference dates
  • STUC Vacancies
  • Affiliate and project vacancies
  • MayDay 2012
  • International Workers Memorial Day
  • Women
  • Unions Into Schools
  • Your rights at work
  • STUC Union Rep Awards
  • Congress 2012 - Inverness
  • Policy
  • News
  • Links
  • Contact The STUC
  • Archive
  • Palestine
  • News
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • March 2002
  • February 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
There is a Better Way Blog

Pensions Justice campaign

%2Ffiles%2Fshot1.2.gif
STUC Twitter
Close the Gap logo
Visit the Scottish Union Learning website
Thompsons - Scotland
You are here >
  • Home
  • News
  • Scottish Government Call to Westminster for increased capital spend must be matched by commitments on Scottish taxes

Scottish Government Call to Westminster for increased capital spend must be matched by commitments on Scottish taxes

September 21st 2009

The Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) will join Scottish Government coalition in pressing the Chancellor of the Exchequer to bring forward capital spending from 2011-2012 to 2010-2011, but the Cabinet Secretary for Finance must support his case by abandoning the Council Tax freeze.

Grahame Smith, STUC General Secretary said:

“The Scottish Government are entirely correct in arguing for the bringing forward of capital spending to enable projects such as the Glasgow Airport Rail link and increased investment in public housing to go ahead. We can create jobs, strengthen infrastructure and improve the chances of a sustainable recovery.

“But the position will be immeasurably strengthened if the Council Tax freeze is abandoned. If implemented, the freeze will be costing £210 million in 2010-2011and the total of the three years since 2007-2008 will be £420 million. Further millions are lost to the Scottish economy through reduced Council Tax Benefit receipts.

“The total cost of the Small Business Bonus scheme, which is in effect another tax cut relative to the rest of the UK, will reach £300 million. The Scottish Government has sought no evidence for monitoring its success and such evidence that has been produced points in the other direction.

“STUC has always argued that Scotland has a strong case for the higher per-capita spending provided by the Barnett Formula, but this is only justified because it costs more to provide public services given Scotland’s relative ill-health, deprivation, geographical remoteness and our different education system. By using a proportion of that money to fund what are effectively tax cuts relative to the rest of the UK, the Scottish Government puts the basis of future settlements at risk and undermines its own case for increasing capital limits for the coming year.”

ENDS

For further details contact

Dave Moxham, Deputy General Secretary

0141 337 8100

Kevin Buchanan 0141 337 8100

©The STUC

Site by CENTRAL